Integration / CDC
CDCInternalIntegration Pattern

Int-CDC-Internal

Problem

A backend workload or microservice requires timely, non-invasive access to incremental data changes originating from another backend workload's persistent data store. The goal is to facilitate data synchronization, enable event-driven processing, or power analytical insights without directly impacting the source system's performance or requiring intrusive modifications to its schema or application logic.

Solution

Implement a dedicated Change Data Capture (CDC) service that continuously monitors the source backend workload's data store for transactional changes (inserts, updates, deletes). This CDC service captures these changes as a stream of events, transforms them into a standardized format, and publishes them to a highly available, scalable event streaming platform or secure object storage for asynchronous consumption by subscribing backend workloads or data pipelines.

Cloud Paradigm

  • Event-Driven Architecture (EDA)
  • Data Streaming and Event Sourcing
  • Loosely Coupled Integration
  • Managed Data Services
  • Data Pipeline Automation
  • Data Mesh Principles (for decentralized data ownership and consumption)

Solution Flow

Change Data Capture (CDC) Flow:

  1. Source Backend Workload: A backend workload performs transactional operations (e.g., insert, update, delete) on its persistent data store.
  2. CDC Service Integration: A dedicated Change Data Capture (CDC) service, deployed in a private subnet (workloads), establishes a secure, non-invasive connection to the source data store. This connection can leverage database transaction logs, triggers, or specific vendor-provided CDC interfaces.
  3. Event Capture & Transformation: The CDC service continuously monitors the data store's transaction log or change streams, capturing raw data changes. It then transforms these changes into a standardized, structured event format (e.g., JSON, Avro, Protobuf), often including metadata like operation type, timestamp, and transaction ID.
  4. Event Publication: The transformed change events are published to a highly available and durable event streaming platform (e.g., Kafka-compatible service) or secure object storage. This acts as a central repository for the stream of changes.

Data Consumption Flow:

  1. Subscribing Backend Workload: A consumer backend workload or data pipeline, located in a private subnet (workloads), subscribes to the relevant topic(s) or bucket(s) on the event streaming platform or object storage.
  2. Event Ingestion: The subscribing workload ingests the change events, typically in chronological order.
  3. Data Processing & Synchronization: The consumer processes the ingested events to update its own data store, trigger downstream business logic, or feed an analytical data lake, ensuring data consistency with the source system without direct coupling.

When to Use

  • When a consuming workload needs near-real-time incremental changes from another service's data store without polling or nightly batch extracts.
  • When the source system's performance and schema must remain untouched, ruling out application-level dual writes or trigger-heavy designs.
  • When multiple independent consumers (sync targets, event processors, analytical lakes) need to react to the same stream of changes from a single capture point.
  • When you require an ordered, durable, replayable history of changes rather than just the current state of records.
  • When teams are moving toward event-driven architectures but the source system remains database-centric and cannot emit domain events natively.

When NOT to Use

  • When the source workload already publishes well-defined domain events; consume those directly rather than reverse-engineering intent from row changes.
  • When consumers only need periodic full snapshots or aggregate reports, where a scheduled batch ETL is simpler and cheaper.
  • When you need synchronous, request-response access to current data — use an API or query interface instead.
  • When the source data store offers no reliable transaction log, change stream, or CDC interface, forcing brittle trigger-based capture.
  • When strict cross-entity transactional consistency at the consumer is required, since CDC delivers eventual, per-row consistency.

Trade-offs

  • Non-invasive, low-impact capture from transaction logs vs the operational burden of running and monitoring a dedicated CDC service and streaming platform.
  • Loose coupling and multiple independent consumers vs eventual consistency and the need to design every consumer for idempotency and replay.
  • Ordered, durable, replayable change history vs storage costs and retention-policy management on the streaming layer or object store.
  • Standardized, schema-managed events vs the discipline required for schema evolution, registries, and backward/forward compatibility.
  • Scalable, resilient asynchronous processing vs added end-to-end latency and the complexity of tracking consumer lag, DLQs, and pipeline observability.

Real-World Example

Consider a retail bank whose core deposit-accounting platform writes every transaction posting, balance adjustment, and account status change to a relational database that cannot be slowed or altered. A CDC service in a private workload subnet attaches to the database transaction log, capturing each insert, update, and delete non-invasively and transforming it into Avro events enriched with operation type, timestamp, and transaction ID. Those events are published to a Kafka-compatible topic, where a real-time fraud-scoring engine and an analytical data lake subscribe independently and ingest in chronological order. Each consumer applies idempotent upserts to stay eventually consistent with the source, a schema registry governs backward-compatible schema evolution, and a dead-letter queue isolates malformed records for reprocessing while dashboards track consumer lag and end-to-end latency across the pipeline.

Additional Details

  • Idempotency: Consuming applications should be designed with idempotency in mind to gracefully handle duplicate events or reprocessing scenarios, which can occur during system failures or scaling events within the event streaming platform.
  • Data Format & Schema Evolution: Standardize the event data format (e.g., JSON, Avro) and implement robust schema management practices. Use schema registries to manage schema evolution, ensuring backward and forward compatibility for consuming applications.
  • Error Handling & Dead-Letter Queues: Implement comprehensive error handling within the CDC service and consuming applications. Utilize dead-letter queues (DLQs) on the event streaming platform to capture and isolate events that fail processing, allowing for manual inspection and reprocessing.
  • Observability: Implement robust monitoring, logging, and alerting for the entire CDC pipeline. This includes tracking:
    • Latency from source change to event publication/consumption.
    • Throughput (events/messages per second).
    • Error rates in capture, transformation, and publication.
    • Consumer lag (the delay between events being published and processed).
    • Resource utilization of the CDC service and event streaming platform.
  • Scalability & Resilience: Design the CDC service and event streaming platform for high availability and scalability, allowing it to handle fluctuating data volumes and source system load without interruption. Utilize managed cloud services for event streaming where possible.
  • Data Retention: Define clear data retention policies for the event streaming platform or object storage to manage storage costs and compliance requirements.

Security Controls

  • Transport Security: Enforce strict Transport Layer Security (TLS 1.2 or higher) for all connections between the CDC component, source data store, event streaming platform, and consuming workloads.
  • Data Encryption: Ensure data is encrypted at rest within the source data store, the event streaming platform, and any transient storage used by the CDC service.
  • Authentication & Authorization:
    • The CDC service must authenticate securely with the source data store, ideally using service accounts with least privilege access, managed identities, or short-lived credentials.
    • Access to the event streaming platform or object storage containing change events must be restricted via Identity and Access Management (IAM) policies, ensuring only authorized subscribing workloads can consume data.
  • Secure Credential Management: Store all sensitive credentials (e.g., database connection strings, API keys) in a managed secrets management service, not in application code or configuration files. Rotate credentials regularly.
  • Network Segmentation: Deploy the CDC service, source data store, and event streaming platform within appropriate private subnets (workloads) with strict network access controls (e.g., Security Groups, Network ACLs) to limit ingress and egress to only necessary endpoints.
  • Data Governance & Masking: Implement data masking or tokenization for sensitive data elements within the change events before publishing, if required by compliance or privacy regulations.
  • Audit Logging: Enable comprehensive logging for all CDC operations, including successful data captures, publication events, and access attempts, for auditing and compliance purposes.

Related Patterns